I’m a very logical writer and I analyze everything from many different prospectives. I do think religious beliefs is necessary to keep society stable, since us humans are still slowly evolving from a primitive level of existence.
I don’t want to offend religious people, but i’ve had a conversation with a religious friend the other day and they wanted to change the subject after I found a loop hole in the Adam and Eve ideology, in comparison to the evolution process. This is what I came up with:
“Evolution theory is a fact”: I came up with my own concept to this, that makes religious people speechless and they want to change the subject.
Most/All molecular biology/forensic scientist believe Evolution is a fact. Judges in courtrooms use these scientist opinion on DNA as 100% fact when convicting someone of a crime. These scientist say its a fact we evolved from ape type animals and chimpanzee’s DNA are 98% identical to us humans.
Why would any courtroom judge take what these people are saying as a fact? If these scientist talk theories why are 100% of criminals found guilty from these scientist testimony?
If a religious person is on a jury, why should they believe what a Forensic scientist is saying in a courtroom? If they don’t believe in Evolution, they shouldn’t believe Forensic science on DNA is accurate either. All these criminals found guilty on rape, Murder or a crime, should be set free, since religious jury members believe we evolved from Adam and Eve; and human DNA evolving from other animals isn’t 100% accurate to them.
If scientist found Adam and Eve’s bones or their kids bones, they would be able to tell if their children killed each other according to the bible. Scientist can solve a murder from millions of years ago and a courtroom Judge will find them guilty, depending on the DNA evidence.
These scientist found Dinosaur bones and can figure out what the animals looked like and when they died. Why wouldn’t anyone not believe what these scientist are saying?